Question: Why do republicans avoid questions that prove them wrong?

( Back )

Answer #1:

Your full of sheeeeeeeeeeeet

Answer #2:

Dude, itll be more then obvious to you in the coming months that the Democrats deregulated the free market into its collapse.

Answer #3:

This question isn't worth my time for a "proof" quality answer. Do some serious investigating into Barney Frank and you'll see he was a big player. No, not like that. Well, like that too I guess.

Answer #4:

Dems forced banks to make bad loans

Answer #5:

Obama's health care bill is the most unConstitutional bill to ever be consider in congress. The government cannot force a Citizen to buy a product from a private company. 10 amendment " The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the people" They would have to change the constitution for this bill to be legal as the bill stands now it is extremely unconstitution

Answer #6:

Yes they did force banks to make bad loans, research Barney Franks and Chris Dodds and then throw ACORN in for good measure.

Answer #7:

Yeah, who are we going to believe anyway??
YOU or DEMOCRATS OWN WORDS;

DEMOCRATS AND FANNIE MAE:
Click Here

Answer #8:

Bwany Fwank is a lib and a little research will revel the truth!!!

Answer #9:

It has been fun to watch.

Answer #10:

I think all of the preceding answers crystalized your initial post question, sadly enough, which is why there can be no real conversation about health care (or anything else) and why the Dems are going to have to force it down their throats with a reconciliation, just like they did Social Security (not the reconciliation, but the forcing due to Reps inability to engage in dialogue).

Sorry, a little off topic, but unlike other people, I don't pretend I know much about the topic, but I do understand the post question.

Frustrating for us, think about our great, elected (for a change) leader.

Answer #11:

Boy you're telling me. I like asking quesitons, "What would the Dems do to improve healthcare", or "what could Obama do better to work with the Repbulcans". Or here's a good one "Has tort in TX reform helped healthcare in anyway, please cite your source?". Most angry conservatives just heckle me, or insult Obama, and none have facts, or good ideas to contribute. See there's no way to work with these folks. THey are like spoiled children sitting at the dinner table refusing to eat with their arms crossed, and fury in their eyes. And what ends up happening, the child ends up getting into a figt later with a sibling and losing.

Answer #12:

Listen to any politician answer a question put in front of them that proves them wrong. No politician will admit to being wrong. My favorite oximoron has always been and I've even told that to a politician. It is "There is no such thing as an honest politician''

Answer #13:

why did Bush do this? Click Here

Answer #14:

to act like Dems

Answer #15:

They can't be wrong because god is on their side Sara is supposedly cute and Dick is supposedly a tough guy...And most important they are entitled to their own facts.

Answer #16:

It was unrestrained greed that caused the problem and when the barrel was empty, they found new and creative ways to keep the wine flowing because greed begets greed. I was there at ground zero. We couldn't believe people would actually buy these things. Imagine a loan that amortizes negatively - where even after you make a payment you owe more than when you started (the incredible Option ARM)! Imagine loans being handed out based on verbal statements regarding income and assets (the equally incredible SISA loan)! Imagine a loan where you don't pay any principle, sometimes for 15 years on a 30 year term, at which time you get socked with a massive increase in monthly payments! We just laughed we were so astounded that there were people out there stupid enough to take those terms. But the mortgagees did and they did because all they cared about was how much the monthly payment was and they did because the loan officers didn't give a flying F about what happened after the sale - they pushed the loan to get their commissions and to make their monthly quotas. And the banks were making a fortune on the front end with all the originations - they were willing to overlook the back end as long as the gravy was flowing. And the CEO's - they didn't care either because for them, the mantra is 3 and out. They come in for a three year contract, make a mess of things and then leave for greener pastures right before the sheet hits the fan. In the meantime, the govt. did absolutely nothing and don't even try to tell me they didn't know. Frontline ran a piece on this very topic at least a year before implosion. If they knew, then so did the Feds.

Answer #17:

Straw man argument by Benanke and you.

It also makes no sense to be prosecuted for discrimination in lending practices - something that falls outside the CRA





** Powered by Yahoo Answers